ABC, NBC Hype President Trump’s ‘Inevitable’ Impeachment By Dems

Newsbusters.org ^ | December 9, 2018 | Nicholas Fondacaro

[blueunicorn6]

I’m OK with them charging Hillary with espionage.

We executed the Rosenbergs for espionage.

I wonder how many press people she would take with her?

[HighSierra5]

This onslaught by the left wing media will only last so long. I’m feeling optimistic tonight. It’s just a gut feeling. They will overplay their hand. They can’t help themselves.

[Secret Agent Man]

Been saying it for 2 years running now.

[Cowboy Bob]

Martha Raddatz is the one who cried on national TV when Trump was elected. That was the highlight of election night for me.

[budj]

The networks obviously know when cohen’s lying and when he’s truthing.

[Sicon]

The thing these msm retards (yeah, I said “retards”!) dont understand, is that no one that voted for Trump cares about, or believes, any of this crap...

Drain the swamp! MAGA!

[Terry Mross]

Bottom line is an admitted liar changes his story after OBVIOUSLY being threatened and coerced against a sitting president. The simple truth is there’s not enough evidence to even arrest anyone.

It’s obvious the goal is to change his supporters by damaging his reputation. There’s nothing they can tell me about Trump, true or not, that will stop me from voting for him.

My fear is there are too many republican senators who are part of the Deep State.

[kiryandil]

2018:
But The New York Times today quotes the incoming chairman of the House Judiciary Committee saying – Jerry Nadler saying, “if the campaign finance case as laid out by prosecutors is true, Mr. Trump would be likely to meet the criteria for an impeachable offense.”

1998:
Mr. Nadler said he was not convinced that Mr. Clinton committed perjury or obstructed justice, but that even if the President did, the offenses would not be impeachable.

"An impeachable offense is an abuse of Presidential power designed to or with the effect of undermining the structure or function of government, or undermining constitutional liberties," No-Nads told several hundred people at the recent town hall meeting at the Fashion Institute of Technology.

1998 - Federal judge Susan Webber Wright begs to differ with No-Nads, the fat lying gasbag from New York:
In a biting, 32-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Arkansas said Clinton gave "false, misleading and evasive answers that were designed to obstruct the judicial process" in Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit.

In other words, perjury and obstruction of justice.

[familyop]

Another Democrat debacle, maybe like the one they involved Justice Kavanaugh in.

[cranked]

The only people still watching lametard NBC and ABC are those who do not have cable, the internet, or satellite and are stuck with like 5 channels......./s

[familyop]

"My fear is there are too many republican senators who are part of the Deep State."

If they don't see the writing on the wall, things will get interesting indeed. [Little understatement there.]

[Verginius Rufus]

Let me get this straight. Cohen drafts a memo of what he is going to tell Congress and circulates it in the White House, and Trump may or may not have seen it. Presumably he was claiming at the time that his testimony was truthful. Later, under pressure from Mueller, he says that the testimony was not truthful and that he knew that it wasn't. Somehow that is going to make anyone in the White House who saw the memo lose their jobs?

Meanwhile Democrats can lie all they want to Congress and there are never any consequences for them.

[so_real]

The two most attacked entities by the main stream media are "Trump" and "Q". You're only taking flak if you're over the target. Interesting.

[Bullish]

The thing these msm retards (yeah, I said “retards”!) dont understand, is that no one that voted for Trump cares about, or believes, any of this crap...

For sure that.

[Gene Eric]

And when will you oblivious idiots wake up to the fact this concerns Disney and Comcast? Ya’ know, companies you happily patronize and subscribe to.

[Liz]

In 1998 Mr. Nadler said he was not convinced that Mr. Clinton committed perjury or obstructed justice,
but that even if the President did, the offenses would not be impeachable.

---

The lewinskied Clinton didn’t just lie. He lied under oath......a transgression serious enough to cost him his law license.

THE IMPEACHMENT OF BILL CLINTON

Attorney David Schippers became a public figure when a friend of his, Congressman Henry Hyde, asked him to be the Chief Investigative Counsel for the US House Judiciary Committee. Schippers was a lifelong Democrat but accepted and took the job in April 1998.

The Hyde Committee was holding an inquiry on whether President Bill Clinton had committed impeachable offences in his handling of the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit..... during which he committed perjury regarding his affair with then-White House Intern Monica Lewinsky. After an investigation, the committee in December 1998 voted to impeach Clinton, a decision supported by Schippers.

On December 10, 1998, Schippers said to the committee:
<><>”The President, then, has lied under oath in a civil deposition,
<><> he lied under oath in a criminal grand jury.
<><> He lied to the people,
<><> he lied to his Cabinet,
<><> he lied to his top aides,
<><> and now he’s lied under oath to the Congress of the United States.
<><> There’s no one left to lie to.”

[kenmcg]

Time for the DOJ to investigate the congressional slushfund that has paid millions of dollars to silence victims of sexual abuse by members of congress.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Impeachment is inevitable. But not for the reasons these morons suppose.

The frothing-at-the-mouth moonbat base of the Democrat Party is going to FORCE the House Democrats to impeach, even though deep down they realize that’s a terrible, pointless idea.

It will go nowhere in the Senate, and will come back to bite the Dems in future elections.