To: Skywise
I have to agree with Roberts and Kavanaugh on not hearing this one. Neither Kansas nor Louisiana went to the trouble to show where funds for “low income women’s health” went. If it could be PROVEN that these funds were being used for abortions - and that’s pretty much all that PP does - then I’d’ve said go for it with this case but without actual documentation of how they lie and skirt the law I don’t see how the SCOTUS could rule it was unconstitutional. They wouldn’t even be able to prove what they were ruling on.
4 posted on
12/10/2018 3:38:04 PM PST by
jyo19
To: jyo19
I disagree....where is it said a state HAS to fund anything?
18 posted on
12/10/2018 4:14:05 PM PST by
ealgeone
(SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE! However, Roman Catholicism has, does, and will change.)
To: jyo19
Bullcrap. They can twist themselves into pretzels when it comes to saving Obamacare. But now they are suddenly solemn craftsmen of the law.
Pure 100% gold plated BS. Roberts is compromised by his homo past and his human trafficking in Irish babies.
22 posted on
12/10/2018 4:56:12 PM PST by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: jyo19
But Thomas said it had nothing to do with abortion, it was a Medicaid issue. But he apparently thinks they voted that way to appease pp.
To: jyo19
PP was caught manipulating their books, violating clinical and sanitary regulations/laws, as well as allegedly selling aborted baby parts under the table.
Kansas said they were not a quality care provider, ended the contract, and found another provider for individuals to access. This is the matter: to determine if the States can end contracts with providers that break the law (Which they have done NUMEROUS times while winning cases against individuals that sued).
Funny, States were given this power and discretion to cut contracts with other ENUMERATED providers that broke laws, however, PP seems to be immune. Apparently Roberts and Kavanaugh has PP's back.
26 posted on
12/10/2018 5:24:40 PM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: jyo19
Even if Planned Parenthood was a legit operation, this should be a clear cut tenth amendment issue. Thomas is right, as usual. Six “justices” went rabbit and hid.
30 posted on
12/10/2018 6:12:29 PM PST by
hinckley buzzard
(Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
To: jyo19
If it could be PROVEN that these funds were being used for abortions -Money is fungible.
I'm sorry, but your argument is nonsense in the real world.
42 posted on
12/11/2018 8:41:13 AM PST by
zeugma
(Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson