Wow, so much to mock in this anti-science propaganda.
1. They claim rising CO2 caused an extinction event and it was due to natural causes, but rising CO2 now is not. And the science that supports this is??
2. Use of non-validated models? Does not get more anti-science than this nonsense. Use of non-validated models equals no information about anything regardless of what the model says.
3. And the definite science on extinction events is? Oh, they are still theories or hypotheses? So we have a hypothesis, an unvalidated model, unexplained naturally occurring CO2 equals humans are baaaddd.
The Rat party hates STEM, is anti-science and anti-religion, but is pro-witch and pro-communist. Both of which are provable nonsense.
[[3. And the definite science on extinction events is? Oh, they are still theories or hypotheses? So we have a hypothesis, an unvalidated model, unexplained naturally occurring CO2 equals humans are baaaddd.]]
Exactly- pure BS- they don’t know what caused the extinctions, and it’s bad bad science to pretend that rising CO2 caused their demise and suggesting it ‘could happen again’- it is pure propaganda-driven fear-mongering plain and simple