based on the comments above, FR has become a total cesspool of ignorance, full of ignorant knee-jerk comments from ignorant people ... i don’t think anyone attacking this guy has a sound basis for their attacks, you know, things like analyzing past performance as AG, past comments, etc. ... all they know is that this guy was AG for a Bush, so therefore regardless of anything else he must automatically be bad ...
RE: all they know is that this guy was AG for a Bush, so therefore regardless of anything else he must automatically be bad ...
Yes, just like Ted Cruz was Trump’s opponent in the 2016 primaries, therefore his proposal for funding the Wall is grandstanding.
> all they know is that this guy was AG for a Bush
And got started with the CIA. AND was a former supervisor to none other than Robert Mueller.
Objections are not unreasonable at all.
The job is to root out the Deep State. This is what Trump was elected to do.
His first AG refused to take on the task and stalled out justice for 2 years. Now the second nominee has an orthodox Deep State background.
This nominee doesn’t even have the appearance of someone who would take on the job of ridding us of the Deep State. This has the appearance of a complete sell-out.