I agree with that as well. She resigned so she could keep her pension in place. She's probably been using her personal time until her actual resignation date of January 4th. I wonder though if her suspension is with pay, or without. I believe Scott suspended her so that if she's criminally charged, her pension can be rescinded. In many cases, government employees that are arrested and criminally charged, are given the option to resign, instead of going through the motions of bringing them up on departmental charges, and going through an arbitration hearing. Their pensions are intact, but they will have to wait until they reach a specific age in order to collect it.
I agree with that as well. She resigned so she could keep her pension in place. She’s probably been using her personal time until her actual resignation date of January 4th. I wonder though if her suspension is with pay, or without. I believe Scott suspended her so that if she’s criminally charged, her pension can be rescinded. In many cases, government employees that are arrested and criminally charged, are given the option to resign, instead of going through the motions of bringing them up on departmental charges, and going through an arbitration hearing. Their pensions are intact, but they will have to wait until they reach a specific age in order to collect it.
______________________________
Thanks for the insight. Hmmm...Sounds good.
I like the idea that she will fight it, because it seems like it opens the door to the gov. providing evidence of her activities that would otherwise not see the light of day. We shall see.