One individual's rights do not supersede another's rights. Someone living on your property cannot dictate how you manage your own property. You are allowed to deny access to your property for any reason.
“The Bill of Rights is directed ONLY at the Federal government.”
The Bill of Rights is a statement of Rights. People establish governments to secure Rights.
“One individual’s rights do not supersede another’s rights.”
Then an individual’s real property rights do not supersede another’s right to keep and bear arms; then a landlord’s property rights do not supersede a tenant’s right to keep and bear arms. Or vice versa. “One individual’s rights do not supersede another’s rights” doesn’t make sense as a standalone statement.
“Someone living on your property cannot dictate how you manage your own property.”
That might depend on the terms of the agreement regarding someone living on another’s property.
“You are allowed to deny access to your property for any reason. “
Not for just “any reason”. In the face of a legal search warrant, “any reason” won’t allow you to deny access. If someone kidnaps my child, confining the child to their property, the reason that they don’t want my child freed doesn’t allow them to deny access to their property.
They may deny access, but that’s not the same as being allowed to deny access.