Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How terrible. It's better to force middle class families to buy policies they can't afford. /s
1 posted on 11/29/2018 8:05:11 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

Pity the cowardly Republicans never simply abolished this Left Wing turd.


2 posted on 11/29/2018 8:08:24 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Not much of an obama legacy left...


3 posted on 11/29/2018 8:08:26 PM PST by 2banana (Were you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Commie federal judge will put a hold on it.


5 posted on 11/29/2018 8:17:07 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Bookmark


6 posted on 11/29/2018 8:20:05 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

equivalent article that doesn’t have a paywall:

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/overnights/419009-overnight-health-care-trump-administration-allows-states-to-loosen

allowing people to buy affordable policies that fit their needs instead of the insanely priced, diamond-plated, one-size-fits-everything obamacare polices is the REAL deathblow to obamacare ...


10 posted on 11/29/2018 8:38:53 PM PST by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Full WSJ article here (via Outline.com) -
https://outline.com/tmUVAY


11 posted on 11/29/2018 8:39:43 PM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How is this any different than the Dem’s exempting themselves and giving waivers to all their buddies when this debacle went into law.


12 posted on 11/29/2018 9:07:05 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index?tab=comments


13 posted on 11/29/2018 9:14:55 PM PST by Concentrate (ex-texan was right and Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. Podesta the molest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

What the administration needs to impose on all parts of Obamacare that are still functioning is that thing that Obama first promised as he was preparing to enter office - transparency.

In all of the last 15 years until 2017 I was covered by a policy from my wife’s employer, a large national corporation with over 12k employees. She was provided with a health insurance package, and could ensure me for ~$300 additional per month. Then she turned 65 in mid 2017 and was covered by Medicare, and I had to go out onto Obamacare - and it was shocking. The first 6 months (the second half of 2017) covering myself only (age 60 at that time, healthy) with a Silver plan through Blue Cross Blue Shield of FL was $880/month. No subsidy due to our household income. In January 2018 the same policy was going to be $1440/month. I elected not to buy insurance and joined one of the “medi-share” type programs that were grandfathered in at the inception of Obamacare. Costs less than $300/month, and appears to have the same deductible profile as the BCBS plans that cost $1140 more each month.

When I am asked to pay $1440/month for something that is not tangible, I spend time analyzing it. The problem here is that the price is all you get - no breakdown of what goes into a premium that high.

The information that I expect to get in a quote would be a breakdown that would tell me what part of the $1440 is a payment to purchase my insurance and what part is a payment to subsidize other policies for other people.

Since the information i not available, I have to guess, and might guess that $500 is the premium to cover my insurance and $940 is a subsidy to buy down the cot of other’s premiums.

I could be way off the mark with that guess, but cannot be faulted because...the government, which must know the information in order to construct the program - doesn’t disclose the information to the public. They are not being in the slightest bit transparent.

Let’s say for the sake of argument that I am correct that the premium breaks down to $500 for my premium and $940 for the subsidy to others. If that was the case, and those numbers were disclosed to me, I could choose to accept it or object to it. And I would object to it and could make my representatives aware of how I felt.

I think that the primary accomplishment of Obamacare was in obscuring from the public the magnitude of the subsidies that are flowing from this group to that in this program.

Make it fully transparent, let every voter/taxpayer know what they are paying for and this will be dismantled in a hurry.


14 posted on 11/29/2018 9:15:43 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

So this entire disruption of the country was to benefit .279% of the population?


18 posted on 11/30/2018 2:33:59 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

NYS cost shares its Medicaid bill with its counties. You can imagine what that does to county budgets. Counties in NYS are canaries in the mine shaft. Medicaid costs will consume states.


20 posted on 11/30/2018 3:37:42 AM PST by mewzilla (Is Central America emptying its prisons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Article mentions 4 templates but never describes them.


21 posted on 11/30/2018 3:54:40 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Brookings blog post criticizing this waiver:

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2018/11/28/the-trump-administration-side-stepped-rulemaking-processes-on-the-acas-state-innovation-waivers-and-it-could-make-their-new-section-1332-guidance-invalid/


22 posted on 11/30/2018 3:58:56 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

What part of “The Secretary Shall” does Patty Murray not understand?

Had to pass it to find out what was in it after all.


24 posted on 11/30/2018 5:47:48 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson