Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skimbell

Personally, I don’t see any functional difference between a bump stock and an unregistered drop in auto sear. They both are modifications to a firearm that allow full auto fire. As a side note, at least when the ATF determined that the streetsweeper shotgun was a destructive device, you could still possess one if you registered it as a DD. Also the normal NFA $200 registration (tax) fee was not required.


62 posted on 11/29/2018 9:30:52 AM PST by bruoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bruoz

“Personally, I don’t see any functional difference between a bump stock and an unregistered drop in auto sear. They both are modifications to a firearm that allow full auto fire. As a side note, at least when the ATF determined that the streetsweeper shotgun was a destructive device, you could still possess one if you registered it as a DD. Also the normal NFA $200 registration (tax) fee was not required.”

Have you ever read the law? What part of it defines a bump stock? That’s pretty important to knowing what you’re talking about.


78 posted on 11/29/2018 9:54:14 AM PST by suthener (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: bruoz

BATFE has previously ruled that bump stocks are NOT full auto because there is still a need for the trigger to be pulled each time a round is to be fired. The bump stock makes this faster than our fingers can do it, but it is NOT full auto.


102 posted on 11/29/2018 10:34:36 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson