Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x

“CFA Jr. led an African-American cavalry regiment in the war and his experiences and reactions turned him against any notions of racial equality. “

I take it that you have never read the essay in question since it never once mentions African Americans, racial equality, or anything resembling the subject.

It’s entirely about the legality of secession and treason. In the original understanding of the American union as held by the South, versus the evolved understanding as popular in the North, and in regards to the United States own birth in the secession of 1776.


52 posted on 11/28/2018 12:42:57 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham; BroJoeK
The reasons why Adams changed his mind in fifty years aren't irrelevant to an assessment of his speech. He came to hate many things about post-Civil War America and that goes a long way to explain why he felt as he did.

Adams's speech isn't a very convincing defense of secession or the Confederacy. It's more rhetorical than a close legal or historical analysis. Adams doesn't convince me that George Washington would have supported Southern secession. He also all but admits that the secession movement wasn't peaceful and was originally inspired by the desire to protect slavery and create a "great semi-tropical slave-labor republic."

But being from one of the First Families of Massachusetts, Adams had much sympathy and fellow feeling for the First Families of Virginia. Nice sentiments, maybe, but what he wrote and said doesn't amount to a convincing justification for the Confederacy.

55 posted on 11/28/2018 2:43:22 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson