Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

It WAS tested in court, and rank choice voting was found to violate the Maine Constitutional....which mentions a plurality of votes...but not the U.S. Constitution, which does not mention a plurality, according to the judge who heard the case earlier in the year.

Therefore, rank choice was not used for governor, or any of the races for the Maine House or the Maine Senate, but was used in the U.S. Senate race and the two U.S. House races.

In the U.S. Senate race, with Angus King running for re-election....he received more than 50.1% of the vote and the 1st congressional district race....with Shelley Pingree running for re-election....she also received more than 50.1% of the vote so rank choice voting did not kick in.


29 posted on 11/27/2018 3:49:59 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Hey liberals! Trump in 2020. Because, 'eff you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Federal courts are prohibited from giving advisory opinions, and there’s a very strict “case or controversy” requirement. I assume that the Maine constitution permits challenges to election laws before they actually affect anyone, but such challenge in federal court under the U.S. Constitution needed to wait for someone to have standing to sue, which is why Poliquin had to wait until now.


30 posted on 11/27/2018 4:12:56 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson