Because Trump is sworn to uphold the Constitution, and the Constitution established three separate but equal branches of government. For the Executive branch to ignore the Judicial branch would be a direct affront to the oath every president takes. Like it or not, you have to work within the system if you want to fix the system rather than destroy it (which is what the left always tries to do).
That's why appointing constitutionalists to SCOTUS is key. SCOTUS needs to reign in the overreach of the lower courts until Congress provides clear limits on their jurisdiction, something that's also long overdue.
“For the Executive branch to ignore the Judicial branch would be a direct affront to the oath every president takes.”
I wasn’t aware that the Executive took an oath to the Supreme court. Btw, The branches aren’t equal, either. Are you sure you’re a conservative? What reality are you living in?
Translating your post...The courts, judges can violate the Constitution all day long and the Executive must grin and bear it while our republic is destroyed. I smell ozone.
Thank you for bringing reason to the thread.
The ignorance of some Freepers is downright embarrassing.
Good Post.
For the JUDICIAL branch to ignore the EXECUTIVE branch would be a direct affront to the oath every judge takes.
For the JUDICIAL branch to ignore the EXECUTIVE branch would be a direct affront to the oath every judge takes.
The Founding Fathers NEVER EVER intended for this to be a judicial oligarchy. That is the biggest scam ever perpetrated upon the American People.
See what Robert Bork writes about the DANGERS of a Judicial Oligarchy:
https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/11/the-end-of-democracy-our-judicial-oligarchy
“Because Trump is sworn to uphold the Constitution, and the Constitution established three separate but equal branches of government.”
True, so why should the Executive branch, in carrying out an obvious Constitutional mandate, per heading up the military, seek permission from the Judicial branch if they are co-equal?