Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I love the article throws in “Kasich, the son of a mailman,” LOL.

To be fair, if you allow abortions you really can’t limit them to before a HB is detected because that can be detected almost as swiftly as a pregnancy test goes positive. It’s kind of a law forbidding abortion. And remember why many, many people choose abortion: a test shows a possible or sure special need. A lot of people turn away from their unborn babies with special needs and prefer them dead. And those tests come later in pregnancy.

How dumb people are because having a child with a special need around makes its own joys and challenges and I frankly am glad for what it has done for our family and our love for our fellow man. I actually cringe when new pregnant parents, asked about gender, say “as long as it’s healthy.” Inside my head I’m yelling, “so? If he isn’t healthy, you’re not going to want him?” I prefer the special needs of babies and children to the special needs of the arrogant adult avenattis and acostas.


26 posted on 11/20/2018 3:46:31 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

To be fair, if you allow abortions you really can’t limit them to before a HB is detected because that can be detected almost as swiftly as a pregnancy test goes positive.


Then why does it say online that it’s 6 to 8 weeks, not ‘immediately’.

They were worried about our daughter since they didn’t hear her HB until about 10 weeks. 45 years later she’s just fine.


34 posted on 11/20/2018 4:02:11 PM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson