And no, I don't want to hear your denials of it. I've found adequate proof that this claim is true, and i've posted it for you in the past. You just refuse to accept that this really happened, because it is not justifiable under the claim one is defending the constitution.
Except that he didn't.
And no, I don't want to hear your denials of it. I've found adequate proof that this claim is true, and i've posted it for you in the past.
LOL! Yeah, what passes for "adequate proof" for you and what passed for "adequate proof" for every single Taney biographer out there don't seem to be remotely close.