To: Reily
Isn’t it obvious that some judge might just as easily order the briefings restored on first amendment grounds? I know it’s crazy but I could see an argument that denying the press the opportunity to observe the body language of the president and his representatives, and the chance to “cross exam” them interferes with “the public’s right to know.”
To: SoCal Pubbie
"Isnt it obvious that some judge might just as easily order the briefings restored on first amendment grounds?"
Yes, which is why these posters who think they are being cunning are actually the most ignorant posters of all the Internet (Because of the massive amounts of examples at their fingertips that prove their ignorance).
50 posted on
11/16/2018 2:01:02 PM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson