Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen
He overreacted because his wife overreacted.

However, we'll never know this kids' true motive for knocking at this door asking for directions to the school he attends everyday.


Discharging a firearm in the direction of an unarmed, fleeing youth is a serious lapse in judgement, and should carry consequences.

Additionally, let's not forget that the standard to be imposed in the accused in such a situation is supposed to be "would a reasonable person act in the same way, given their state of mind at that moment?". A jury might well find that the homeowner failed that test—notwithstanding the wife's clear overreaction to the situation.

Presuming that the accused was apparently found guilty by a jury of his peers, I don't have an issue with the convictions—assuming that said jury was fully informed. But having said that, I think that this sort of incident is better seen as a "no harm, no foul" situation, where "everyone has learned important lessons". Thus, putting this homeowner behind bars with some real criminals—especially for any significant length of time—is not what I'd consider "justice".

"Let the punishment fit the crime"; in this instance I am of the opinion that the penalty imposed was too severe...

49 posted on 11/13/2018 12:07:28 PM PST by sargon ("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
Discharging a firearm in the direction of an unarmed, fleeing youth is a serious lapse in judgement, and should carry consequences.

Disagree. Firing a shot over a kid's head seems quite reasonable to me. The message is "Don't come back."

Additionally, let's not forget that the standard to be imposed in the accused in such a situation is supposed to be "would a reasonable person act in the same way, given their state of mind at that moment?". A jury might well find that the homeowner failed that test—notwithstanding the wife's clear overreaction to the situation.

I can't see the video, but someone else who did said that it didn't look like he fired the gun on purpose. Accidental discharge is a different animal. I actually find that more offensive than a deliberate discharge intentionally aimed away.

"Let the punishment fit the crime"; in this instance I am of the opinion that the penalty imposed was too severe...

What does it cost to keep an inmate nowadays? Isn't it like $40,000/year? They are going to spend a minimum of $160,000 to keep this guy locked up?

Stupid.

65 posted on 11/13/2018 12:31:44 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
...a "no harm, no foul" situation, where "everyone has learned important lessons".

What important lesson did the kid learn?

Better be fast if you’re going to be black?

156 posted on 11/13/2018 4:21:38 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson