Usually ‘people who don’t show up to vote’ are the ones ‘voted’. It’s another reason the FBI should seed voter roles with fake names... then when non-existent people show up as being ‘voted’ you’ve caught democrats doing fraud.
~~~
Now that I have been elucidated to the fact that there is no way to verify a ballot belongs to a legitimate voter after the fact, and for very important reasons including voter anonymity, I think this is idea seems to me like the next best alternative to doing fraud sampling.
But I have a question: Since we know the FBI wont do it, I ask why can’t private citizens and media organizations do it? The later would be preferred, because the media can go straight to the presses when they get evidence of fraud, as well as the fact they are more likely to have some degree of protections under the first amendment from being prosecuted for fraud themselves.
Why can’t an investigative team at Fox News, or the Washington Times, or the Wall Street Journal submit a dozen or so carefully prepared voter registration applications and then monitor the polling locations for those precincts or polling locations where they have their volunteers working?
Too much work? Too Risky?
Probably wouldn’t be able to get any of their own people inside the precincts where the fraud is likely to occur. Seems like they control that sorta thing.
Our side should NEVER consider breaking that law - and not just because it's wrong but because we would be held accountable in a way democrats would NEVER be held accountable. It's off the table. I understand your concern about what's happening - I share that concern z3n. But our side can't pick up democrat tactics even if we're 'doing right' in the long run. Our safety is based on staying within the law...
Even democrats add real names... they run 'sign a petition' scams in minority neighborhoods and use those names - often of illegals who don't want to risk a run-in with the law but are too afraid to ask for their names to be taken off a petition - or off voter rolls ...
For fraud to be effective and NOT easily traced you need lots of names on the rolls. Lots of people who 'won't' show up' to vote.
The easiest way to catch fraud is to look for 'mistakes'...
"Mistakes" like 'the dead vote'.
Since 'the dead' don't ever show up in person to vote - ANY time a dead person 'votes' it's proof of fraud. Pass a law that 'the dead' can only be removed from the rolls every 5 years. If the vote is honest, it won't make any difference if their names are on the rolls or not. If it's NOT honest it's a great marker. Also, check ballots for 'down ballot' races not being voted. People who do fraud don't have time to vote every race...
Also voter fraud is traditionally done in minority neighborhoods - BALLOT BOXES ARE HELD BACK UNTIL THEY KNOW HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO 'JUST WIN' WITHOUT TRIGGERING 'CONCERNS'...
Boxes coming in very late on tight races should always be checked for fraud... (Minority 'community' votes turned in four or five hours late - or later are typical tells of this type fraud (I believe white liberal 'elites' are behind the fraud that's done in minority communities but I don't have proof - just a guess).
Also it's likely 'very close' races will generally tip to democrats nationally for this reason. They don't mess with races that obviously should go to Republicans - that would be waaaaay too risky - and the folks doing this are paranoid about what they're doing... well, not back in the Chicago days... but in more modern times there would be concern.