[Ancesthntr]

“Well, change the law to keep the accused from voting.”

---

You can’t. The definition of a person who has merely been accused of a crime is “an innocent person.” Much as it often hurts (like here), we have to do this or EVERYONE’S rights will suffer. Process is critical to preserving the rule of law.

What everyone here should be much more upset about is that this murderous scumbag hasn’t yet been convicted. Had Justice been a bit more swift, we would not be discussing this.

[familyop]

Irony and sarcasm were intended in that part of my comment, as the remainder of my comment showed. But yes, Cruz hasn’t been convicted, yet, and that problem is apparent.

[MayflowerMadam]

been accused of a crime is ‘an innocent person’.”

Technically, that would be “a PRESUMED innocent person”. People are wrong when they say someone IS innocent until proven guilty. This guy is guilty with so many eyewitnesses at the scene.

Anyhow, I’m sure this guy and Israel are now BFFs. The shooter did what he was told, voted Rat, and has received some sort of compensation for it.