To: aimhigh
This makes no sense.
Limiting the profits of a health clinic leads to limiting the wages of healthcare workers. Healthcare workers whose wages are limited are less able to afford union “representation.” Some of them could even decide they do not want the union.
How does this benefit the union? Or was the purpose of this simply to harm a business, a goal which unions seem to care about above all else?
Anyway, I voted against this. There is no way the state should dictate how much profit a particular business can earn.
7 posted on
11/10/2018 11:43:09 AM PST by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: exDemMom
A law was passed in the early 70’s requiring dialysis to be fully paid by medicare. Perhaps this has led to some negligence in the quality of care given. There are so many people needing this life-saving treatment that, in some places, it is difficult even to find an opening. When you die, your place is immediately taken by the next person waiting.
8 posted on
11/10/2018 12:01:46 PM PST by
Freee-dame
(Best election ever!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson