Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aimhigh

This makes no sense.

Limiting the profits of a health clinic leads to limiting the wages of healthcare workers. Healthcare workers whose wages are limited are less able to afford union “representation.” Some of them could even decide they do not want the union.

How does this benefit the union? Or was the purpose of this simply to harm a business, a goal which unions seem to care about above all else?

Anyway, I voted against this. There is no way the state should dictate how much profit a particular business can earn.


7 posted on 11/10/2018 11:43:09 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom
A law was passed in the early 70’s requiring dialysis to be fully paid by medicare. Perhaps this has led to some negligence in the quality of care given. There are so many people needing this life-saving treatment that, in some places, it is difficult even to find an opening. When you die, your place is immediately taken by the next person waiting.
8 posted on 11/10/2018 12:01:46 PM PST by Freee-dame (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson