Really doubt those folks are a “voice of the CIA,”
*************
***************
Please respond to the context of my comment rather than a portion of the comment. I was referencing my local newspaper NOT WaPo.
1. This was your first comment: "My former U.S. Senator served our country well during his tenure as Attorney General. "
2. Your initial post linked to the WaPo.
3. My first comment was regarding how the WaPo is CIA-linked.
4. You respond, "I actually read the commentary in my local news rag but was unable to locate a link. Really doubt those *folks* are a “voice of the CIA,” but....". I rebut your response with a link.
5. You also respond, "Please respond to the context of my comment rather than a portion of the comment. I was referencing my local newspaper NOT WaPo." Thus, your own comment in (4) above is unclear. By "folks", I inferred that you meant the WaPo. Evidently, you meant your "local news rag". We want clarity - CLARITY! How can anyone respond to you in a coherent fashion when you can't even express your thoughts with clarity? And you have the gall to scold others about the clarity of their posts (e.g. Post 130). Sheesh.