Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Terry Mross
I joined in 1969 and we were told getting a tattoo was an Article 15.

Thank you for your service. I've been in the Navy since 2003 and tats have never been completely banned, but there has been changes to what is allowed. I knew a Marine who had to get forearm tattoos removed before he was allowed to enlist.

IIRC, when I came in a waiver was needed to enlist with anything visible past short sleeves and any new ink post-enlistment required a chit from your chain of command (which was rarely enforced). These days, anything goes. The Navy is pretty relaxed. Maybe too relaxed. I'm not against tattoos but I'm seeing a lot of really bad ones. They're taking up entire arms and increasingly creeping up people's necks and the tops of their hands which just looks ghastly.

150 posted on 11/08/2018 2:16:08 PM PST by Drew68 (Twitter @TheRealDrew68 https://twitter.com/TheRealDrew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68

And thank you for your service.

Growing up in the fifties it was pretty much accepted that everyone who joined the navy would get a tattoo. Whenever a guy came home on leave all of us kids would ask to see their tattoo. Inevitably there would be a “sweet” under one nipple and a “bitter” under the other one. Gross! And, of course, “mom” somewhere.


151 posted on 11/08/2018 2:23:05 PM PST by Terry Mross (On some threads it's best to go jst inraight to the comments..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson