Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rissole

Right and wrong. Your example would be 16,000 net for Abrams
I said she needs about 25,000 (to force a runoff)
I was countering a claim she needed 65,000
In an honest election, a change would be impossible. Even with fraud, a net change of over 25K is really hard to pull off. So you’re likely correct that Kemp’s win is safe.


68 posted on 11/07/2018 9:21:05 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: ETCS
Huh? 60% of 80,000 is 48,000. :) Even if you make it 58%, that's still over 45,000 for Abrams, and clearly not enough.
70 posted on 11/07/2018 10:07:35 PM PST by rissole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: ETCS

Oh, sorry, I think I misunderstood you. You’re talking about a NET of 25,000 for Abrams. Got it.

Anyway, like you said, that would be really hard to pull off, so it appears Kemp’s got this. :)


71 posted on 11/07/2018 10:09:58 PM PST by rissole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson