When both severely negative (or positive) and severely improbable outcomes are declared as forgone conclusions or even likely conclusions worthy of declaring that the sky if falling there is irrationality. It would be on you to support the likelihood of your outcome rather than on me to show it's unlikely. Already I am warning myself against engaging with your style of disturbed thinking.
The style in which you laid it out, admittedly a presumption on my part, suggests this is a habitual pattern for you.
That is, you are
A: Run by your thinking, rather than the other way around.
B: Chronically negatively biased, which is a form irrationality.
Since peace and joy are in fact rooted in clarity, and since you are not clear as a result of negative bias, I am suggesting that if you experience the world as chronically negative and/or more extreme than you would like, you might seek either psychological help or take up a practice that anchors you more firmly to your surroundings.
That's the best I can do.
It's possible to be a concern troll without knowing you are one.
Please tell about the improbable outcomes, when:
Pelosi becomes the Speaker, who will then hand the gavel over to Schiff.
Then there’s, potentially, 3 priorities for the Dem’s
The President, the only person on the planet, is the only person I’d want in the White House right now. But after Jan 3rd, 2019, he’s going to be getting hit from all sides.
The Republican candidates that did win, didn’t win by much. DeSantis won by .8%. That isn’t anything to do victory laps over and say the sky is the limit in Florida. That should be a signal that sh*t ain’t right. Do you, or anyone else think that there aren’t more caravan’s of Central and South American’s forming up right now, getting ready to make their way to the Southern border. Where, the House Dem’s will offer them a free ride to the sanctuary state of California.
Cruz only won by 2.9%, in Texas.
I’m not trying to be an a$$, but feel free to explain to me what is so rosy right now.