If this is the reason then it shouldn’t stand. We don’t have to accept fraud. It should be looked into nationwide. I’m sick of having to win by a larger percentage than we should just to overcome fraud.
I've had people make the argument to me, "Well, we just need to win by a big enough margin to overwhelm the fraud." But I say, that is totally undemocratic (small "d"), because it requires the victim of the fraud to achieve not just a majority, but a supermajority, to win elective office. And, worse, there is no limit to how large that supermajority must be. Just keep piling on the fraud, and it requires an ever-increasing supermajority to "win". That isn't how it should be.