Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

He gave Hillary Clinton a 92 percent chance of being elected president, so his chance of Republicans retaining the House is lower than Mrs. Clinton’s chance of being president.


10 posted on 11/05/2018 7:20:08 PM PST by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TBP

No he really didn’t it was more like 78% chance.


12 posted on 11/05/2018 7:21:51 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

With Nate Silver’s predictions, you have to use a Hillary Clinton-fudge factor of minus-40 to reach a more accurate Silver number.

Nate needs to take a year off...just tour the country and talk to regular people.


46 posted on 11/05/2018 8:07:07 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
He gave Hillary Clinton a 92 percent chance of being elected president, so his chance of Republicans retaining the House is lower than Mrs. Clinton’s chance of being president.

He actually gave her only a 71% chance of winning the Electoral College in his final projection.

49 posted on 11/05/2018 8:15:12 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson