Replies

I only saw how a protestor was handled inside the debate hall.

LOL Bannon “won” the most converts about populism even though Bannon was somehow caught off guard by Frum’s RINOism (i.e. liberalism and Trump hatred).

Bannon won because he has the facts... but since Frum got so many good shots in, it’s a wonder.

Personally, Bannon needs to figure out what he really believes about Christ. Once he does that, I think he will be able to see what ideology the brotherhood of the Uniparty RINOs like Frum really believe. David Frum has exhibited more hatred towards the deplorables/Tea Party than most RINOs over the years (including a spit in your face hatred of Andrew Breitbart when he was alive) and Bannon can’t see what really motivates people like Frum.

I really don’t understand it. Lame Duck George Bush helped candidate Obama during the 2008 economic meltdown that Bannon understands so well. Bannon should understand that, but it’s like he’s spiritually blinded to the fact that RINOs are more “evil” than Dems because they lie about their true liberalism.

LOL again though... Bannon won the debate and even the debate moderator couldn’t believe it. Liberal Unipartiers like Frum just don’t make any sense.

Frum is cut from the same cloth as Karl Rove and other pro-abort RINO liars. Bannon lost points and his bearings in this debate because he wasn’t expecting it... though he recovered well on the question of George Soros.

I don’t get it. The RINOs have been the enemy of conservatives/Bannon since before Palin and Tucson. Why is Bannon in anywise impressed with Frum? (There was a certain amount of glad-handing after the scores were announced and their banter was caught on mic as they walked backstage.)

Frum’s books are unreadable drek — sorry, Steve.

I have read your carefully worded reply and felt impelled to follow events on Canadian television. The outbreaks of some violence and six arrests noted. Also the usual suspect, a screaming woman inside the debate venue. I need more study before I conclude the outcome of the debate.

I had tried to understand the RINO phenomenon. The nearest thing in Ontario is the "Red Tory". The definition is "a conservative politician, while maintaining some conservative principles, supports many Liberal and Socialist policies".

I can only think that it is the politically correct spectre, that makes politicians want to be liked. Perhaps it is part of the human condition. The hard lesson they do not seem to learn is this.

Try to please everybody and it leads to pleasing nobody.