Given all the other hoaxes which all have the same object in mind (make the Dems look good), I have to wonder if there was a double hoax involved here. Surely if the concept of a woman being paid off to make false charges is now in play, then so can be the concept of being paid off to make false charges for the purpose of having those charges easily exposed and producing an election-relevant shift of opinion.
I’m tired of being hoaxed. I expect another big hoax within 72 hours and I am tired of that one too, whatever it turns out to be.
Yes, he could be an agent provocateur.
Me too. I’m not touching this thing with a 10 foot pole.
Your scenario is certainly more plausible than the original.
But I still wonder aloud why anyone would fall for BS from Jack Burkman and Gateway Pundit.
I continue to be amazed that GP is allowed on FR.
that was my thought as well - no woman has been identified, no person has been identified. Just that the right has been accused of trying to smear a guy who should already be smeared enough by his meandering “investigation” and his participation in the Whitey Bulger affair
It almost sounds like a reverse O’Keefe operation. Fabricate a narrative almost every conservative wants to hear, tell the mark what they want to hear and you’re halfway home. Concoct a story with details which can be proven false and feed the story to some young eager beaver conservative blogger looking to make his mark. Then just sit back and revel in the lolz as the conservative outlets pushing the story are made to look like fools. It’s reminiscent of the op he tried to pull last year on the WaPo with the woman who tried to claim that Roy Moore raped and impregnated her as a teenager then had her get an abortion. Say what you will about the Post, but they did their homework there.