Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cba123
Oh yes I am. Note the last part of my quote. An actual court case.

So, just in case you missed it:

In 1884 the Supreme Court held that children born to Indian parents were not born "subject to" U.S. jurisdiction because, among other reasons, the person so born could not change his status by his "own will without the action or assent of the United States." And "no one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent."

75 posted on 10/31/2018 8:40:19 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Vote GOP this November. Take two friends to vote with you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: cba123

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elk_v._Wilkins


76 posted on 10/31/2018 8:42:05 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Vote GOP this November. Take two friends to vote with you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson