Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Snickering Hound
It is not crystal clear. It is quite muddled in a way that it didn't need to be had they kept the original language. Ryan is not correct. The 14th was never intended to make citizens out of transient aliens. If you read the debates on the 14th amendment, John Bingham, chief author of the 14th amendment, makes it clear that the children of anyone who is a subject to a foreign power do not qualify.
98 posted on 10/30/2018 2:32:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
It is not crystal clear. It is quite muddled in a way that it didn't need to be had they kept the original language. Ryan is not correct. The 14th was never intended to make citizens out of transient aliens. If you read the debates on the 14th amendment, John Bingham, chief author of the 14th amendment, makes it clear that the children of anyone who is a subject to a foreign power do not qualify.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

You have a link for John Bingham writing that? Thanks.

102 posted on 10/30/2018 2:38:15 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson