The old law in New Hampshire basically encouraged this illegal cross-border voting, but the new law makes it much tougher.
But, as usual, some leftist local judge decided two weeks before election day to rule the law unconstitutional. These last-minute 'rulings' by leftist judges are a standard tactic, having seen it in Texas regarding Voter ID. The law is passed 18 months before the first election it applies to. A lawsuit is filed immediately thereafter. And then things stall until JUST BEFORE the voting starts, when a typical leftist judges throws out the law, thinking that there won't be time to appeal. The problem for the leftist judges is that by throwing out the law so late, emergency appeals can be filed, and the good guys are given an excellent defense, as seen here (and in Texas) where the upper courts don't have to rule on the constitutionality of the law, but rather the disruption and confusion created by the lower courts in waiting so long to throw out the law...so the law stands!
A win in the courts. Who would of thunk it...
But I figured "with my luck I'll be the *one* person who's actually prosecuted and I wouldn't do well in prison"...so I didn't.
It goes without saying that Rat Party Headquarters will take this to the Federal courts....on Monday.
Typical Democrat obstruction tactic, just before an election. It didn’t work this time.
Cheating is critical to the democrats in this elections. All of there eggs are in that basket. By using all of their various cheating tools on every level then I expect the cheat votes to total in the hundreds of thousands.
It doesn’t read like a victory to me, unless you are for out-of-state cheaters voting. What am I missing?