___
No bias or presumption there.............
/s
Posted on 10/26/2018 1:24:47 AM PDT by a little elbow grease
Thanks for posting the video. I’m headed their now. Just had to get to a different computer.
CNN is saying that this was an assassination attempt on two former Presidents, one former VP, etc and that Trump has not called them.
Of course, now the CNN narrative is the bombs were sent to "Trump Critics" to keep linking Trump to the fake bombs
He sees things more clearly than almost every other analyst of current events with the only exception being Daniel Greenfield.
___________
He's fabulous.
The Washington Insider – Media Resistance, Who really runs the government? -
Daniel Greenfield FrontPageMag ^ | September 12, 2018 | Daniel Greenfield
I see a lot of resemblance between the two.
I did have trouble with one sentence however (see below). Do I need more coffee or is this sentence in need to some editorial review?
Take James Wolfe and New York Times reporter Ali Watkins, where the thirty year difference between the Senate Intelligence Committee security director and the 26-year-old Pulitzer nominee (the most disgraceful Pulitzer jorno who hadn’t actually colluded in Communist genocide) and his marriage didn’t obstruct trigger the scruples of media outlets getting the inside scoop between the sheets.What is that? What is an "obstruct trigger"? Is that a new verb?
And is that sentence a classic run-on or am I just not yet awake?
The scary thing is that I new what he was saying.;-)
Chris Plante talked about this too. I heard that these devices didn’t have blasting caps.
“Knew,” not “new.”
Agreed. My fascination with Greenfield is matched with a similar interest in Sundance. Greenfield is a more seasoned analyst but Sundance has a coherence that bedevils his critics. Both are seminal thinkers.
If they can find a Conservative corpse to plant evidence and blame it on, they will announce the case solved 5 days before the election.
If it's a leftwingding, and they probably already know who it is, they will slow walk the investigation until after the election, and leak the whole time implying that it is a Conservative wearing a MAGA hat that they suspect.
LOL ............... it was a crumby sentence.
Thank God. I was afraid it was just me.
___
No bias or presumption there.............
/s
More people watch Sponge Bob Square Pants than CNN. At the rate they are losing viewers, pretty soon the only people watching will be in their green room.
They do not have blasting caps, triggering devices, power supply, appropriate wiring, a working prototype, or explosives. They are toys, not bombs. I get it that appropriate authorities must treat them as potentially lethal, right up to the point they are examined. After that they are evidence of possible forensic nature. My guess is Antifa half wits.
Yes ...... and similar sick ideas about "control" of societies/people.
And Sundance is remarkably insightful, particularly considering he is just an anonymous blogger.
Just goes to show how the internet is changing the world of journalism and commentary. The guys who are big shots at print and TV media are now outgunned by guys who make it on pure merit.
Absolutely ROFL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.