“in the Sessions and Boyd letters, Huber was only tasked to advise on any needed resources.”
These letters do not task Huber to do anything. They are letters to other people.
The actual taskings to Huber have not been publicly revealed.
There is no reason to assume that Huber’s tasks are strictly limited to those items publicly revealed in those letters. In fact, DOJ policy prohibits publicly discussing, or even confirming the existence of investigations that are underway.
Any actual investigations would have had to be omitted from those publicly released letters.
But if a US Attorney (like Huber) becomes aware of credible information of a crime, they would have a duty to pursue it. That responsibility is routinely discharged by referring the information to the US Attorney with the appropriate jurisdiction. The DOJ IG has the same duty to refer credible information of a crime, and to do so in a timely manner.
These letters do not task Huber to do anything. They are letters to other people.
You're nitpicking what I wrote while you avoid my obvious point.
The letters INFORM CONGRESS that Huber was tasked to advise on any resources that might be needed. There were no further taskings described in those letters.
The actual taskings to Huber have not been publicly revealed.
You make my point.
There is no real evidence that Huber has been tasked to do more than what appears in the Boyd/Sessions letters.