Replies

the nation wanted ‘change’- They wanted a both a ‘first black man to hold office’ and a ‘rock star’- and the msm portrayed him as such- Just like the nation is going to demand change again, either electing the ‘first gay person’ or ‘first woman’ as president sometime soon-

Unfortunately, the majority of people don’t vote based on substance- they vote on appearance- on trends- Obama was an unknown ineffective senator that hardly even voted in congress- Yet the country embraced him simply because he was black, and the country wanted to give the impression that they were hip and politically correct- instead of voting based on credentials, like they should have- Had they taken his ineffectiveness in government position previously, they would not have supported him- how coudl they? He was a failure then, it shoudl have been obvious he woudl be a failure as president-

But the really sad part was, that after the first 4 years of damage to the country, high unemployment, super high gas prices, food prices etc- the country elected him again-

It’s bad enough they elected him based only on appearances, thinking they were hip trend setters- but my goodness- it was absolutely horrible that they elected him for a second term after the damage he did to this country- my goodness- ‘Leading from behind’? Seriously? Our country thought that that kind of sissy touchy feely pacifism was worth electing again? I got seriously worried about this country’s ability to do the right thing after watching that socialist get elected for a second term, let alone a first term

Fox interviewed a woman on the street and asked why she voted for obama a second time- and she got a crap eating grin on her face and said “So I can get me sum of Dat obama-money”

When asked where she thought that money would come from, she got that crap eating grin again, and shrugged her shoulders, and said “It’s just free, dats all”

Yes, I got seriously worried about this coutnry’s ability to choose the right leader after hearing tha