Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
My point is that this is how it is seen. People and the Courts have accepted this, whether it is right or wrong. My personal opinion on the matter is that the 14th was never intended to grant citizenship to the children of transient aliens, and this is clear if you read John Bingham's commentary in the debates on the 14th amendment.

My second point is that the 14th amendment cannot create "natural born citizens" because "natural born citizens" already existed before the 14ht, and did not require the 14th to be citizens.

Therefore any citizen who relies on the operation of the 14th amendment, cannot be a "natural born citizen" as the term was understood by the Founders.

184 posted on 10/21/2018 11:21:19 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Thanks. That’s an excellent paddling over never heard anyone explain before.


192 posted on 10/21/2018 1:26:09 PM PDT by Jack Black (See my profile for Muller vs.Trump scorecard and other analysis of various anon claims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson