[LukeL]

Only thing that makes sense as not disposing of remains in no way saves money.

[Blurb2350]

Only thing that makes sense as not disposing of remains in no way saves money.
That's exactly what it is -- cutting corners to save (or pocket) money. I think mortuaries are paid a small amount to handle the bodies of stillborn children. Easier to pocket the moolah and stash the corpse until . . . later. Just as election fraud is 99% Democrat, these funeral home horror stories occur 99% of the time at black-owned facilities. Remember the mini scandal over Emmett Till's disinterred coffin? That happened at a black-owned facility.

[UCANSEE2]

Only thing that makes sense as not disposing of remains in no way saves money.

Yes it does.

No fee for having them cremated saves the Funeral Home money.

Since these may be unwanted babies (fetuses and infants), then the Funeral Home bills the state for a cemetary plot, and yet can sell that same plot to someone else because no one is going to come try to visit the plot from the unwanted cases. MO MONEY.

[Vermont Lt]

Not true.

If they were supposed to be cremated, you make 100% profit. You hold them until you have enough to fill a coffin, them burn them all at once.

In a lot of these areas, you gotta think like a gangsta.