Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
The one in which one tests what the limits of the law are. Try testing it sometime with a pocket knife whose manufacturer claims it to be "not more than three inches long" according to industry standards, and a federal officer measures it.

Everything is in the wording of the law gives one the warning that a shotgun barrel be "not less than 18 inches" which means in fact that you had better make sure that the Breech-face to muzzle tip had better be longer than 18.00 inches, for a length very close will be subject to the interpretation of the examining officer alone, not yours. Only a fool would possess such a firearm, which could conceivably mean merely having it in your hands, even if passed to you by a Federal officer or other LEO who him/herself may legally possess it. You do not have to own the weapon to be considered breaking the law. Merely handling it will do, especially if you leave your fingerprints on it.

The same principle would have applied to the subject of this article. Keeping it in a locked safe means nothing to the law. But it does certainly mean that the vet possessed it.

123 posted on 10/19/2018 10:37:29 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

“Only a fool would possess such a firearm, which could conceivably mean merely having it in your hands, even if passed to you by a Federal officer or other LEO who him/herself may legally possess it.”

I know breaking the law is wrong. And I don’t advocate it.

Have you ever in your life driven 66 mph in a 65 mph zone?


124 posted on 10/20/2018 6:08:57 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson