Posted on 10/18/2018 8:30:29 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
Special counsel Robert Mueller has assembled a list of figures cooperating with his Russia investigation that could provide him with substantial insight into the workings of the Trump campaign.
Mueller’s ability to turn associates of President Trump into cooperators has been a key facet of his investigation, lending both strength to a probe that has pressed on for nearly a year and a half amid withering public scrutiny.
Legal analysts expect former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and other recruits to bring the special counsel closer to getting to the bottom of whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow, though doing so may hinge on Mueller striking deals with even more figures.
With Mueller’s probe advancing behind closed doors, it is impossible for onlookers to judge the value or extent of any one witness’s cooperation.
At the same time, observers say the deals Mueller has struck signal he believes their cooperation to have significant value.
“If they have struck a deal where they’re going to cooperate, then that’s a pretty good indication that special counsel’s office believes they have something worth cooperating over,” said Jack Sharman, a former special counsel to Congress for the Whitewater investigation.
In Manafort, the newest cooperator, the special counsel has a window into the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between top campaign aides and a lawyer with connections to the Russian government.
The key question surrounding the Trump Tower meeting and other key events is whether members of the campaign conspired with Russia to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions, and to what level any such conspiracy rose in the campaign.
One-time national security adviser Michael Flynn is also viewed as valuable to Mueller’s investigation because of his role in the campaign and, briefly, the administration, and because of his own contacts with Russians.
Flynn pleaded guilty last December to lying to FBI investigators about his discussions with then Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak about sanctions on Moscow during the presidential transition. Court documents show he also talked about those conversations with other members of the Trump campaign.
Mueller asked a federal court to move forward with Flynn’s sentencing last month, a signal the special counsel believes he has gleaned all the information he can from the former adviser, and a sentencing date has been set for Dec. 18.
Other campaign associates also have been ensnared in the investigation.
Richard Gates, Manafort’s longtime business partner, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and false statements charges in February and began to cooperate with Mueller’s team in their case against Manafort related to illegal foreign lobbying.
It was Gates’ testimony that ultimately helped prosecutors secure a guilty verdict against Manafort on eight counts of bank and tax fraud in Virginia federal court over the summer. Manafort was due to begin a second trial in D.C. in September, but instead agreed to plead guilty and work with prosecutors.
Others who have agreed to assist the special counsel but are not considered key figures.
Richard Pinedo, a California man who pleaded guilty and cooperated in the case against the Russian troll farm, was sentenced to six months in prison. Mueller also secured an obscure cooperator in Sam Patten, a GOP operative and former Manafort associate. Neither was involved in the Trump campaign.
The first person known to be cooperating with Mueller’s probe was George Papadopoulos.
Mueller’s team, however, has signaled that it gleaned little from the former campaign adviser, whose guilty plea made headlines last October when it revealed he had been told the Russians possessed “dirt” on Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails” — before WikiLeaks began releasing hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee.
“It was at best begrudging efforts to cooperate and we don't think they were substantial or significant in any regard,” Andrew Goldstein, one of Mueller’s prosecutors, said at Papadopoulos’s sentencing hearing last month.
Papadopoulos was sentenced to 14 days in federal prison for lying to FBI agents about his Russia contacts. He subsequently told CNN he has “no recollection” of sharing information about emails possessed by the Russians but couldn’t “guarantee” it.
Mueller’s team has also reportedly interviewed Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney, though no formal agreement cementing his cooperation has been publicly released.
Sharman said the value of various people now talking to Mueller’s team could vary depending on what offenses they are looking into, and who they are considering charging with crimes.
He also acknowledged the opacity of the matter, something exacerbated by the fact that Mueller never speaks to the press.
“Nobody knows outside of that office and outside of the grand jury, what the substance of anyone’s cooperation is,” Sharman said.
Trump has long scorned the Mueller investigation as a witch-hunt and claimed charges against Manafort and others have nothing to do with his presidential run.
He acknowledged in August, however, that the Trump Tower meeting was predicated on getting “information on an opponent,” undermining a statement by his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., last year that it primarily focused on American adoptions of Russian children. The participants have said that the meeting did not ultimately bear fruit.
“My son’s a good young guy. He did what every other person in Congress would do if somebody came up to them, said, ‘Hey, I have information on your opponent,’” Trump told the Associated Press in an interview Tuesday. “There was nothing wrong with having an opposition research meeting and nothing happened from the meeting.”
Manafort, who attended the meeting along with Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, would have been privy to discussions concerning the meeting and could potentially speak to Trump’s knowledge of it. The president claims he had no advanced knowledge of the meeting.
“He can talk about the conversations that took place before, during and after,” said Seth Waxman, a former federal prosecutor in D.C.
“I would put Manafort leaps and bounds above everyone else simply because of the time and effort the government put in to flip him,” Waxman said. “When the government goes as hard and as deep on someone like Manafort, it’s because they want him for a purpose and they believe he has very valuable information.”
Manafort’s value extends beyond his involvement in the Trump Tower affair. Having spent five months as campaign chairman, Manafort could answer questions about the softening of language in the Republican Party’s platform on Ukraine and any possible accords with the Russians.
Former federal prosecutors also expect Mueller’s team to question Manafort on whether the campaign had advanced knowledge of Democratic emails hacked by Russia.
Court filings and proceedings have offered glimpses of the information provided by other players.
It was not initially clear whether Gates, who also worked on the Trump campaign and later on the transition, was cooperating beyond the Manafort case. However, a recent filing from his attorney suggests he is helping Mueller on other aspects of the investigation.
In a motion asking the court to remove Gates’ GPS tracker and lift some of his travel restrictions last week, his attorney, Tom Green, wrote that Gates’ interviews with the special counsel’s team “have been numerous and they continue to this day.”
Neither Manafort nor Gates have been sentenced, though Manafort will appear in federal court in Virginia on Friday as Judge T.S. Ellis looks to move forward with his sentencing for the bank and tax fraud charges.
There is broad agreement that Mueller is unlikely to take major overt steps in the investigation before the midterm elections, reflecting what has become routine practice of Justice Department officials to avoid moves that could be construed as political close to an election.
Bloomberg, citing anonymous officials, reported Wednesday that Mueller is expected to issue findings on his inquiries into collusion and obstruction of justice after the elections, under pressure from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to complete the probe as quickly as possible.
Trump said Tuesday that his legal team was reviewing a series of written questions that Mueller had submitted for him on the collusion inquiry.
“We are looking at certain questions having to do with the word collusion,” Trump told the AP. “Of course there was no collusion. So we are looking at that, and we’ll make a determination.”
Meanwhile, recent grand jury appearances by associates of Roger Stone suggest that Mueller is circling the longtime Trump ally, who has been scrutinized for his links to WikiLeaks.
It is possible that Mueller has brought other cooperators into the fold who are unknown to the public; this could include individuals who have plea agreements that are under seal, who have not yet been charged, or who have voluntarily agreed to cooperate.
“Your job as a prosecutor is to go as high up the chain of the organization as you can and prosecute the most culpable people and put an end of their criminal conduct,” said Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama.
“He’ll want to keep going so that the people who he prosecutes are the people who are the most responsible for any criminal conduct he uncovers. No prosecutor wants to stop at the midway point, [though] sometimes you have to because you don’t acquire enough evidence to go higher,” Vance said.
Unless there's not 'there there'.
it will not matter about the facts, this will be brutal, live or die for the Russian inteligence called the cia and the Fbi
If yinz guys want to criminalize campaigning, bring it on.
After the election Trump’s new AG will launch a whole slew of investigations into the Hillary campaign.
And the Clintons still walk the streets FREE known criminals....
“There has to be a pony in there somewhere.”
Even if the Mueller-Weissman gang doesn’t unearth anything substantive against Trump, they’ll invent it. They’re not going away without their pound of flesh.
If they think they are going to railroad POTUS they do it at their peril.
“If you give me six sentences written by the most innocent of men I will find something in them with which to hang him.” Armand Jean du Plessis, Duc de Richelieu
yaaaawwwwwnnnn
Yep. The whole article reads as though they are not saying they are about to nail a bunch of people but, rather, that they will have enough info to know if there is anything to prosecute at all.
In another era, these would correctly be called “stooges”.
After the election Trump’s new AG...
***************
I’m counting the days. I just hope Trump is quicker about firing Sessions than he has been about Rosenstein.
It’s getting close to the midterms so the Democratic Media Complex has to remind the public Trump is under investigation for ‘collusion’ with the Russians.
“If they have struck a deal where they’re going to cooperate, then that’s a pretty good indication that special counsel’s office believes they have something worth cooperating over,”
that is actually tangential to the headline.
all of the "facts" are recycled, all of the conclusions have been concluded before. it's a story about nothing.
Did Flynn lie or did Flynn make a false statement?
There is a substantial difference.
It's close to the midterms so the media as to remind the voting public Trump is still under investigation (and is likely guilty of colluding with the Russians to steal the election).
... and with a trail of dead bodies in their wake that would make Frank Nitti, enforcer for Al Capone, mentor to Saul Alinsky, blush with infernal pride.
Believe it or not, a lot is going to depend on the outcome of the midterms. If the Dems win the House, Mueller goes full-bore. If the Dems get smoked, then he writes an inconsequential summary of the events for the history books.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.