Aside from the political tin ear here, I think Lizzy might have been suffering from the lawyer’s delusion that if you can parse something so it falls within the hair of the law, it will work in your favor.
She showed (from an unverified sample) that she had some smidgeon of genes that also showed up in a proxy sample of Central and South America. The lawyer’s take could be, “I’m part Indian, even if its a small part, so I’ve met Trump’s test.”
That’s forest/trees legalistic reasoning. It also tells us a lot about her cognitive limitations. And, about the Democratic conviction that the MSM can sell just about anything to the American public.
This dog won’t hunt 50%, except with the Massachusetts electorate.
How unbelievably stupid is the Massachusetts electorate?