Ret Prof Susan Feiner
Please. Stop torturing us.
Next we’ll be seeing Helen Thomas pix.
Yikes... a professor of “women’s studies” and “feminist economics” … who knew there was such a thing as “feminist economics?” Evidently it is a new thing.
There’s a slightly more flattering pic of her here:
http://www.womensmediacenter.com/profile/susan-feiner
“Her 2004 book, with Professor Drucilla Barker, Liberating Economics: feminist perspectives on families, work and globalization, was an “outstanding academic title.” Feiner is now focused on economic journalism for progressive social change. She has a monthly column in the Maine Sunday Telegraph.”
I’ve seen friendlier smiles on angry rottweilers...
Just saying...
I wonder what Laz would do...?
Support Free Republic, Folks!
She’s “retired” - how old is she?
Need new hairdresser fast.This is GREAT news.
Ratemyprof has some not very flattering reviews mixed in with those from suck ups...
Even the suck ups seem to agree she is crazy, disorganized, and frequently loses student papers.
Also, shows up 10 minutes late to class and is intolerant of different viewpoints.
Just in time for Halloween.
Dayum! She even uggier than Helen Thomas!
It’s the evil grimace that does it.
Whewee that’s a butt load of ugly.
She once plagued the University of South Australia :
The Political Economy of the Devine
https://www.unisa.edu.au/Documents/EASS/HRI/working-papers/wp18.pdf
In this she comes off as a jealous woman who, misunderstanding the concept of the union of two responsible people into one person in Judeo-Christian marriage, is so devoted to her mistaken belief about the males’ role that she rejects the woman’s role as if it is inferior, rather than equally necessary to a relationship, and actually ENVIES the role of men while disdaining that of the woman.
It’s not the equality of the sexes she wants, she, like all socialists, is jealous of power and so wants a male’s role of supreme authority in a relationship...forgetting that the ultimate authority is God’s alone, and both male and female are subject to it. While the woman is subject to her man when married, it is only insofar as her man is subject to God. Wherever he defies God he has no authority over her, but where he is obedient to God he will not only be worthy of his authority but it will be a joy to defer to this authority, they will be of one mind. If a husband is a Godly man he cannot consider a Godly woman to be less of a person or a slave to himself... he has to accept that together they are one person in the eyes of God and must love her and respect her as much if not more than he does himself.
We cannot all be generals. But a general leads best when he and his men understand their roles and fulfil them FAIHFULLY. That one leads and others follow, does not imply inequality of personhood. Authority is not injustice. A good general doesn’t just want to be feared for his power, he wants to earn the respect of his men, that they may have faith. And to have that, he cannot abuse his authority over them. He has to be dutiful himself.
The unholy love-child of Mickey Rooney and that “throw mama from the train” lady.
Another educated White Female.
Looks like an angry lesbian...Thank you USM. Maine is not a liberal state, moderate yes, but they love freedom and individualism there.