Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Vote for Democrats?
Townhall.com ^ | October 16, 2018 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 10/16/2018 7:43:12 AM PDT by Kaslin

Given what the Trump administration is saying are record achievements for a president at this stage in office, why would anyone consider voting for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections?

Writing in The Washington Examiner, Paul Bedard lists 289 accomplishments of the Trump administration, beginning with the obvious one, the economy: "They include 173 major wins, such as adding more than 4 million jobs, and another 116 smaller victories, some with outsize importance, such as the 83 percent one-year increase in arrests of MS-13 gang members."

They also include two justices now on the Supreme Court and 82 other federal judges confirmed to lower courts.

As the White House has touted, unemployment in all demographics is the lowest it has been since 1969. Despite a recent blip in the stock market, portfolios have grown fatter since Trump became president. An analysis in The Wall Street Journal predicts economic growth is likely to continue "for years."

Other positives include updated trade deals with Mexico and Canada that will produce benefits for American manufacturers and workers far more than the old NAFTA deal ever did.

Consumer confidence reached an 18-year high in September, according to Lynn Franco, director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board, which conducts the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index(R).

Top this off with the successfully negotiated release of Pastor Andrew Brunson from a Turkish prison and a more realistic foreign policy in confronting America's enemies.

Top this off with the successfully negotiated release of Pastor Andrew Brunson from a Turkish prison and a more realistic foreign policy in confronting America's enemies. CARTOONS | Tom Stiglich View Cartoon

According to Gallup's weekly tracking poll, for the week of Oct. 7, the president's approval rating jumped a percentage point, from 42 percent to 43 percent. His disapproval rating holds at 53 percent, though that number is down three percentage points from the week of Sept. 16. Rasmussen, which tends to be more favorable toward Republicans, puts the president's approval at 51 percent. That is higher than President Obama achieved at a similar point in his presidency. Presidential polling does not necessarily forecast voter behavior in state and local races, though one Quinnipiac University Poll shows that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has a nine-point likely voter lead over his opponent Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas).

In view of Republican successes, including tax cuts and the booming economy, what Democratic policies would produce results better than these? Other than spite for the president, why would voters elect candidates who want to return to a past where things were far different?

Do people who didn't have jobs during the previous administration want to embrace policies that kept them unemployed? Do businesses once prevented from hiring people because of regulations now wish to have regulations re-imposed and to lay off workers they recently hired?

By what logic do some people wish to return to the recent past, including a recent past that includes Republican presidents who cannot lay claim to the type of successes President Trump is enjoying?

Perhaps most amazing is the president's growing approval among African-American voters, whose votes he is openly campaigning for as evidenced by rapper Kanye West's endorsement and the president's reciprocal embrace. USA Today reported on a new Rasmussen poll that shows "approval rating among African Americans is at 36 percent, nearly double his support at this time last year." Despite the NAACP's hostility toward the president, African-American voters seem focused more on results than symbolism.

Polls have been wrong in the past -- take the 2016 election as the latest example -- but the president has begun touting his record while campaigning for candidates. That record appears to be resonating with voters, at least in some states. Never has the Ronald Reagan question "Are you better off than you were four years ago" seemed more relevant. Never has the answer appeared more obvious.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: presidenttrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Kaslin

As far as I can tell this is the democrat platform.

1. The Constitution is Unconstitutional!
2. The Supreme Court is illegitimate!
3. The President is illegitimate!
4. Abolish the Electoral College!
5. Abolish ICE!
6. We don’t accept election results when we lose!
7. We will use violence and the threats until we get our way! (this is the definition of terrorism)
8. When we are in power we will not stop using violence and intimidation! (this is the definition of tyrrany)
9. Those who oppose us do not have the right to exist. (the palistinians do not recognize the right of jews to exist and seek to kill all jews.)
10. We will raise taxes...period!
11. We will implement socialist ideology and socialist economic policies through out the US.
12. We will contribute billions of American tax payer dollars to the UN, Global Climate Change, Iran, and other globalist entities.
13. We don’t care for Americans. We are concerned with investing in the Global Community.
14. After the midterm elections in Nov 18 we will go straight to work looking for Donald Trumps taxes and any other dirt on any republican. The rights of Americans are not part of the democrat platform.

Seriously, why would anyone even consider voting democrat?


21 posted on 10/16/2018 8:32:04 AM PDT by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

There is a book written on this subject.

Yes I tried to read it but all the pages seem to have been written in invisible ink ...


22 posted on 10/16/2018 8:51:47 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Halo-JM; All
Cowboy Ken:
The Choice of MOBS or JOBS

Thanks to FReeper Halo-JM.

23 posted on 10/16/2018 9:00:29 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We do not have a legitimate two party system because the democrats are the party of lies and deceit and the attempt to bring back a 19th century philosophy that has failed everywhere it has been tried. I would like to see a total destruction of the democrat party so that the republican party can split into two legitimate voices- one for conservatism and one for republicanism, where there are good arguments on both sides.


24 posted on 10/16/2018 9:10:38 AM PDT by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Despite the NAACP's hostility toward the president, African-American voters {those supporting Trump} seem focused more on results than symbolism.

That puts African-Americans who support Trump right squarely in with how many of us feel. Trump's a man of action and results - NOT of cheap words and pity party manipulations.

I feel a coalition coming on..

25 posted on 10/16/2018 9:25:50 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats protect MS-13, Open Borders and Criminals. Our side wants JOBS NOT MOBS....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Let me guess. All the pages are void of any print? Am I correct?


26 posted on 10/16/2018 9:42:27 AM PDT by BubbaBobTX ("The problem with socialism is you eventually run out of other peoples money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Perhaps Trump should start using the Ronald Reagan question “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” in campaigning for the mid-terms.

Except he can proudly ask: “Are you better off than you were TWO years ago?”


27 posted on 10/16/2018 10:45:26 AM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

28 posted on 10/17/2018 2:52:36 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson