Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry

She has claimed Oklahoma Cherokee blood. “The Cherokee Nation” may be used by all three branches, but the others must define themselves as Eastern Cherokee, and the other southeast band. The Cherokee Nation, does not recognize them as part of their nation, even though, in reality, they all came from the same base and area. Not sure why they won’t, but as I’m sure you know, it has been a bone of contention fora very long time. Probably the same as with the Loyal Shawnee vs the Eastern Shawnee and Absentee Shawnee. They know they’re all related, but have separate tribal governments.


56 posted on 10/16/2018 9:43:32 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Flaming Conservative

That would depend entirely upon just how far back her purported ancestor might be. Removal occurred not long before the Civil War, within three generations potentially for someone of her age.


57 posted on 10/16/2018 12:10:26 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson