Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Slavery would have been perfectly safe in the Union, just as it was in the Union slaves states during the war.
413 posted on 10/15/2018 10:37:22 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

In that you are correct in my opinion. Lincoln would probably not have taken any action to end slavery in the United States. His opinion was that based on the Supreme Court ruling in Scott v. Sanford, he had no constitutional authority to use the Federal Government to interfere with slavery where it was legal. This, however was not the view of some of the Southern States which chose to withdraw from the Union. Their belief was that a Republican controlled House and Senate in unison with a Republican President would, at some point in time, take action to end slavery as it existed in 1860. The only avenue left, in their view, was to withdraw beyond the power of the Federal Government. Hence, secession was the answer to allay their fears.


417 posted on 10/15/2018 10:51:43 AM PDT by Bull Snipe (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson