“Who said the homeowner lied? Even you seemed to agree, the video has obviously been edited at a very critical time. It’s up to the police investigators to determine if the video has been edited, compromised and or had a technical issue, regardless of what the homeowner or his lawyer have to say about it.”
The shooter claims he slipped and that caused him to fire his weapon. Clearly, the video does not show that he slipped.
Again, if the video was edited, the defense lawyer should have spotted that.
Hire a good lawyer today, or spend the next ten years trading packs of cigs for bologna sandwiches.
I don't see how they couldn't. If this video was the actual evidence seized by law enforcement, it should have been investigated by them. This is not disputable. In fact, I've viewed 2 other video from this case, and both also appeared edited. It jumped out immediately. So How is it possible the police investigators missed this?
Btw, lawyers and their clients say things all the time that are not true or inaccurate. That's why it's the direct responsibility of the cops to investigate all the evidence.
Anyone who carries that doesn't carry a USCCA card too is asking for a prison cell.