Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimRed
and most of us on the right said "colored" or "negro".

And was always intened to be non-offensive and generally taken that way.

But now the cultural elite has been diddling with unoffensive words, co-opting unrelated words, and trying to tweak the American culture more to their liking.

Being a bit old fashioned and refusing to bow to cultural whims seems to be an issue with the fashion conscious.

86 posted on 10/11/2018 1:01:42 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69

I hear you. I refuse to use “gay” when talking about homosexuals, and seldom use queer, faggot or fag, blowboy or rump ranger. Ho-mo-sex-u-al, all five syllables, works just fine and an occasional sodomite in appropriate context can substitute.

And don’t get me started on the trannies. One of my young adult nephews has decided to be a girl, but I decline to refer to him as her or she, and still use his male name. If he’s had his chopitoffame (chop-it-off-a-me, the operation) I have not heard about it, nor do I want to.

I make some of the relatives uncomfortable, but that’s on them.


88 posted on 10/11/2018 2:27:52 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson