Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bird45

Garland was simply denied a confirmation hearing. Republicans never tried to destroy his reputation.

What was happened to him in no way justifies whaf the Democrats have done to Kavanaugh.

And to borrow from their position expressed in these past hearings, there is no entitlement to a seat on the Supreme Court.

Sounds fair to me and Garland is still a judge on the same appeals court as the one on which Kavanaugh served.


3 posted on 10/08/2018 2:31:44 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

In the Garland case, had President Obama realized the various impacts of losing control of the House and Senate early on in his Presidency...then this Garland episode would have a minor issue, and he would have been easily approved by a majority Democratic Senate. From day one....President Obama had zero concern about the Democrats maintaining the House and Senate numbers.


6 posted on 10/08/2018 2:44:00 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson