Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
Apologies... 17th was designed for ended the representation of the States and the firewall in the face of populism. Type to fast.
97 posted on 10/09/2018 5:35:41 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi
It's true about the "firewall against populism." The founders expected that state legislators would elect more experienced and judicious men to the Senate than voters would send to the House.

And the equal representation of the states would guarantee a voice for the small states in the government - a voice that wouldn't be heard otherwise.

The idea, though, that the senators were expected to be agents of the state legislators isn't quite so well-founded.

The opponents of the constitution pointed out that the state legislatures' right to choose senators didn't amount to so much if state governments weren't allowed to recall senators who didn't do their bidding.

Obviously, senators would have to be accountable to the state legislators, but from the beginning, they had more freedom of action than we might think now.

98 posted on 10/09/2018 5:45:29 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson