Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
But the comment of “intentionally shooting him in a vital part of his body” as some indication of wrongdoing by the prosecuting attorney is just silly.

I fired a warning shot through his liver, sir!

15 posted on 10/06/2018 7:32:05 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom

All humor aside, shooting someone in a “vital part” in the torso is a weird accusation from a prosecuting attorney. Not going to shoot for the head (for most people you go for the torso, right?)

I mean, shooting through the heart would be a vital part, but most people wouldn’t aim for the heart, they would just be trying hit the person anywhere they could and consider themselves lucky to have made a torso shot that hit. (Most of us aren’t Special Forces people!)

I suppose the best thing would be a non-fatal torso shot to incapacitate the person if they aren’t actually coming at you with a weapon (which would be different...you WOULD want the person to go down for good so they can’t continue to attack you if they had a gun or a knife) in which case you wouldn’t have a dead body and police action might be different.

I don’t have any experience at this, but I do think about it. I don’t think it is a bad idea...not that it will certainly help in a crisis, but I would rather consider it in advance rather than doing it on the fly.


18 posted on 10/06/2018 7:42:34 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson