Skip to comments.
Kagan warns that Supreme Court may not have a swing vote anymore
The Hill ^
| 10/05/18
| JUSTIN WISE
Posted on 10/05/2018 7:01:04 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-204 next last
To: af_vet_1981
This remark astonishes me——she seems to want to give a tremendous amount of power to ONE justice.
.
81
posted on
10/05/2018 7:22:19 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: Intolerant in NJ
If Hillary had won, there would be no swing votes either.
Elections have consequences and this one was for all the marbles. Thank God we were blessed with Donald Trump, an unselfish, hard driving genius.
82
posted on
10/05/2018 7:22:29 PM PDT
by
caltaxed
To: yesthatjallen
83
posted on
10/05/2018 7:23:34 PM PDT
by
Hugin
("Not one step from his weapons should a traveler take"...Havamal 38)
To: yesthatjallen
Obviously, Kagan has no clue about the constitution or the SCOTUS. But we all knew that going in, including the idiot that appointed her.
84
posted on
10/05/2018 7:24:17 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: yesthatjallen
Kagan and Sotomayor are invalid appointments. Made by a marxist muslim usurper. It’s time to remove those ceckless communist funts from the bench.
85
posted on
10/05/2018 7:24:25 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Jeff Sessions IS the insurance policy)
To: yesthatjallen
Wonder how she will feel once RBG is replaced!
86
posted on
10/05/2018 7:24:53 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(Fascism and socialism are cousins. They both disarm their citizens.)
To: yesthatjallen
There is no requirement for a "swing vote" in the Supreme Court, just as there is not a required number of right-middle-left justices.
87
posted on
10/05/2018 7:25:04 PM PDT
by
Major Matt Mason
(Any lover of big government is an enemy of freedom.)
To: pacificus
Plain and simple, she exposed herself as a partisan, and she herself undermines the legitimacy of the leftist justices on the high court.
Exactly.
The concept of a “swing vote” means someone who doesn’t only vote her political opinion. What an admission.
88
posted on
10/05/2018 7:25:18 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
(.)
To: Yaelle
She can swing. Hang her high.
89
posted on
10/05/2018 7:25:24 PM PDT
by
JusPasenThru
(Progressives need to get over their love affair with abortion.)
To: yesthatjallen
So for roughly 200 years then there was no “swing” vote... and that’s a problem, that it won’t have one now???
Silly
To: yesthatjallen
To: SkyPilot
Look closely. It’s a younger butch lesbo Chuck Schumer.
92
posted on
10/05/2018 7:27:07 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: yesthatjallen
Just where in the Constitution is there anything that says there should be a swing vote? Is it in the same place as the provision for penumbra, privacy, and abortion?
Does she even contemplate that there could possibly be 9 conservative origionalists on the Supreme Court?
Swing vote? What a total ass!
93
posted on
10/05/2018 7:27:26 PM PDT
by
laweeks
To: yesthatjallen
So Kagan has admitted SHE is a doctrinaire leftist who does not consider each case objectively.
Leave b!+ch!
94
posted on
10/05/2018 7:28:15 PM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: yesthatjallen
Luckily the SC still has 2 dykes /sarc
95
posted on
10/05/2018 7:29:06 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
To: CivilWarBrewing
“Another giant SH*T on America by Odunga Hussein, the Indonesian Muslim”
Yup.
96
posted on
10/05/2018 7:30:16 PM PDT
by
Electric Graffiti
(Jeff Sessions IS the insurance policy)
To: yesthatjallen
In my opinion Kagan ‘The Wise Latina’ is the one who does not have a judicial temperament. In fact the hag is breaking longstanding Supreme Court custom by remarking upon and getting politics about a Supreme Court nominee before during the Senate confirmation process.
97
posted on
10/05/2018 7:30:45 PM PDT
by
WMarshal
(America First)
To: yesthatjallen
98
posted on
10/05/2018 7:31:05 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: yesthatjallen
Yes, you still do.
Roberts.
99
posted on
10/05/2018 7:31:41 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(MAGA)
To: yesthatjallen
100
posted on
10/05/2018 7:32:16 PM PDT
by
myerson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-204 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
