Posted on 10/02/2018 2:24:16 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
“This isn’t new!
She has already claimed 54 separate sex partners “before college!”
“Where were all the these loose Women when I was in High School? LOL”
I’m buying a time machine when I win the lottery.
Kristinn Taylor, a long time FReeper, posts frequently on the site. I have found GP to be pretty reliable. It is updated very frequently, which sometimes has them getting ahead of the story, but it is more often right than not.
If those high school boys had just known they did not have to wait their turn
outside the door. They could all have gone in at the same time. /s
She has already claimed 54 separate sex partners “before college!”
The Bunny Boiler (liar #3) didn’t make this claim, Ballsy Ford (Liar #1) made the claim. 54 sex partners before college, that’s just stomach-turning disgusting!!
Ballsy Ford needs to be publicly slut-shamed to the max. She’s no better than gang rape/orgy lover, Liar #3.
But Ms. Swetnick is pure as the driven snow.
Michael Avenatti
@MichaelAvenatti
The letter from Dennis Ketterer is garbage - the GOP is desperate. The allegations he makes are false and without any basis. We demand that the FBI interview my client & him, and that anyone found to have submitted false info be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
5:07 PM · Oct 2, 2018
WOW! Somebody should ask her that question under oath.
Not gang rape.
Consensual gang bang.
She was confused which was which.
LOL .... right on cue, Corny Porn Lawyer acts true to form and as predicted. Thanks for letting me know!
Not only NO, but HELL NO and we're "broken up" effective immediately!!!
Avenatti can Tweet until the Bunny is boiling, but he is not the one who just signed a Statement under Penalty of Perjury.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I went back and checked the Judiciary Committee notes earlier today to see if Swetnick’s statement had in fact been submitted. Avenatti was contacted numerous times to arrange an interview and to submit evidence and he didn’t do it. I figured he did not submit Swetnick’s statement - as long as it wasn’t given to the committee or FBI, it didn’t matter if she swore under penalty of perjury or not ... it’s not a crime to lie to the public - happens all the time.
I had to laugh (wickedly, I confess) because CPL Avenatti DID submit her sworn statement ... probably to keep her from backing down on her story .... which she did anyway during her NBC interviews. She’s now got her t!ts in the wringer & he should have his anatomy in a wringer, too.
Here is what I wrote about Avenatti in a previous post:
Swetnick already backed up on the details in her sworn statement. Avenatti keeps saying he’s got a woman in FL to corroborate, etc. but if you look at his history with the Judicial Committee, he’s had plenty of chances to bring Swetnick forward with evidence and he has yet to do it. It appears he will only allow his clients to talk to the FBI .... he does this because talking to the FBI, in a twisted way, adds credibility to what his clients allege - must be serious/credible if the FBI wants to interview. It’s also better optics for him as a ‘serious’ lawyer, and if the FBI is involved, it’s more damaging (optics again) to those he is trying to hurt. He’s a media whore/got major personal financial problems, just like Swetnick. He must be getting desperate on Swetnick with no FBI interview, so he’s letting her go peddle her Kav character assassination in the media with the NBC interviews. Avenatti is the male version of Gloria Allred. If Avenatti is associated with your case, then likely by that fact alone, you are not credible and have no evidence.
apparently these women are trying to get revenge for the nominee NOT giving them what they wanted in 1973
Raise your hand if this at all surprises you about Swetnick.
Anyone? Anyone?
Nope, didn’t think so.
And this may be why the NYT is doing some serious back peddling and proves that phone caller guy who said he knew her family when she was a girl and that she was on serious psycho drugs. It may also be why the FBI isn’t going to interview Ford.
I $uspect $he could be per$uaded to tell the truth.
Return customers aren’t victims.
.
You are correct!
My bad, not reading the original post, and reacting to a recent one :o)
.
LOL. Schadenfreude. So Avenatti, other than that, how did you enjoy the play? I am sure he didn't see that one coming. Be careful what you wish for.
I can’t believe this story has been here for an HOUR but hasn’t broken?
.
I agree!
This is where immunity would benefit the truth.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.