I doubt she was under hypnosis.
I think my sense that she started from personality disorders and worked her way back to a story is becoming more plausible.
The emotions behind such a product would be entirely real, and would fit with her creation of knowledge she didn’t possess.
I could go with the ‘personalities disorder’.......I could see her abused as a little girl, using that teeny tiny voice
She doesn't need to be hypnotized.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that she is an expert on the subject of hypnosis.
Given her background, she knows how to play her audience (the Committee and the TV audience). She knows exactly how to elicit the desired result (which is sympathy for herself).
“I doubt she was under hypnosis.
I think my sense that she started from personality disorders and worked her way back to a story is becoming more plausible.
The emotions behind such a product would be entirely real, and would fit with her creation of knowledge she didn’t possess.”
How do you explain the artificial little girl voice and little girl body language. She came off like a 10 year old girl talking to her mother or her father. She did not have the appearance of a 52 year old college professor testifying in an important proceeding before the U.S. Senate.
It was only the Kavanaugh part she had memorized. When asked simple questions about her fear of flying and the details of 1982 she was like a child, oblivious to the questions and the details.
I would like your opinions. I have my impressions but no proof.
The 5 year old baby girl voice she did during the hearing was enough to convince me she is a phony baloney liar..she read Mark Judge’s book, took some names out of that book and called them her attackers, that simple