They don’t care, now they moved on to him being an alcoholic and a violent temper that is “unfit for the Supreme Court”.
Somebody needs to whip Flake, Collins and Murkowski in line.
She doesn’t have a case. It’s an allegation about behavior in high school 36 years ago. There is no legal case filed.
Not exactly. More like Ford’s testimony was damaging to her case.
bookmark
Republicans: just do the right thing! Vote!
Mitchell’s memo is very illuminating - Ffffford’s inconsistencies & holes in her story (and it WAS a story) were very obvious to someone who is a professional in the field.
Here are two threads from Margo Cleveland that further illuminate inconsistencies in her testimony & show how she changes her story every time it looks like Kavanaugh can refute her version .... very interesting.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1046408449918218240.html
Thread by @ProfMJCleveland: “THREAD: For those thinking Mitchell wasn’t strong enough on Ford, you’re wrong. Her gentle demeanor & allowing Ford to talk revealed A L […]”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1046219137285070848.html
Thread by @ProfMJCleveland: “THREAD: Let me ask you something. If a woman came forward and said that she was sexually assaulted in the summer of 1982 when she was 15 by […]”
It will be ignored because this isn’t a court of law.
Her fact-based report gives every Senator a clear basis to vote to confirm Kavanaugh.
Note well that Christine Blasey Ford does not know how she got to the house, a house she does not know where it was located. She does not know whose house it was. After she says she ran out of the house, she was a 20 minute ride from her house, but she does not know how she got there. She does not know who drove her home. This was a very rehearsed testimony. All of the above items would help substantiate her story were erased from her testimony, purposely, I contend. If she knew who drove her home, it would be a big one. If she knew who’s house it was or the address it would also be big. Notice that all of the items she cannot remember could prove that it did not happen if the parties were to be asked. Convenient! Was it on purpose so she did not perjure herself on anything that can be proved?